IMPORTANT NOTICE: Nerddict will be officially and permanently parked to on the 2nd of April, Kindly BOOKMARK and ANTICIPATE!!!
Download Our Android App → CLICK HERE
Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Donald Trump Forcing Apple To Move Production From China To US: Realistic Or Not?

With the new United States President, Donald Trump pushing new policies with “made in America" goods being one of the policies he wants his administration to enforce, we look at how realistic it actually is for tech giants Apple to manufacture their tech gadgets in the US, knowing that Apple manufactures its products in China.

Trump had during his campaign promised to force the company to bring iPhone and other gadget productions to the United States.

This is part of a long going war between the new US president and Apple with Trump at some point asking Americans to boycott Apple products!

Image result for apple donald trump

However, while other big companies bid to be on the favourable side of the new administration with promises of jobs or investments in the United States, tech giants Apple has remained mute and low-profile.
Major Apple contractor Foxconn this month confirmed that it is considering a $7 billion investment to make flat panels in the US in a joint project with Japan’s SoftBank.

Foxconn founder Terry Gou is quoted as telling reporters:
“I have discussed with my major clients about going to (the US) and they are also willing to invest, including Apple,” 
Taiwan-based Foxconn has given no details, and Apple declined to comment.

Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry believed that moving manufacturing to the US, where many customers are, was more of a commonsense move than a political one, saying:

“You need to manufacture local products in local markets,” 
"Making things locally gives better control of distribution networks and lets manufacturers customize goods for local markets"


Whether politically motivated or not, Apple is not in the same position as automakers which relocated US factories overseas to cut costs, according to IHS manufacturing processes chief analyst Dan Panzica. Apple never moved jobs offshore, it created them there.

“The Apple jobs were never here. The entire supply chain grew in China.”

Apple benefits in Asia from a network that goes beyond subcontractors assembling smartphones, tablets or laptops. The California-based firm relies on a dense ecosystem of companies that make components and spare parts for its devices as well.

China also offers sources of important raw materials, along with cheap, flexible and abundant labor to keep iPhone assembly lines cranking along.

It would be “very hard to replicate” that situation with US workers without using “more robotics and less workforce,” undermining the political aim of creating jobs here, according to Endpoint Technologies analyst Roger Kay.

Exacerbating the challenge, “it makes no sense to make phones here if you have to ship all the components from China,” said technology analyst Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates.


The MIT Technology Review in June considered several scenarios, from simply bringing assembly to the US to simultaneously shifting the manufacture of parts here.

The Review estimated the extra manufacturing cost of an iPhone 6S Plus at $30 to $100 as a result of those moves.

It is difficult to imagine that Apple would risk its status as the world’s most profitable company to absorb such a hike in manufacturing costs.

“Apple will never lower its margins on its flagship product, the iPhone,” said Ovum consumer technologies analyst Ronan de Renesse.

Apple is under pressure from investors to keep its high margins, and already faces slowing growth of iPhone sales.

So, would US consumers put their money where the political talk is and pay more for iPhones stamped “Made in the USA”?

Not all analysts were convinced.

It was seen as more likely that Apple would make a symbolic move to appease Washington, such as investing more in making Mac Pro computers here, or in a facility for higher-priced, limited-edition devices such as an “anniversary edition iPhone” to mark the handset’s 10th birthday this year.

“I would be very surprised to see a major production shift to the US,” Gold said while discussing Apple.


Breaking the US technology star’s successful business model should be out of the question for the Trump administration, and there is likely to be a compromise such as “financial incentives,” according to Ovum analyst de Renesse.

Foxconn is already trying to get US states to woo it with grants of land, cheap energy, or tax breaks.

Apple could seek tax amnesty for the $200 billion or so in profits it keeps overseas in exchange for increasing local manufacturing.

The economic equation would change if Trump went on the offensive by imposing heavy customs duties on Chinese imports.

Given Apple’s dependencies on partners in China, and its keen desire to gain traction in that market, Apple could find itself an early casualty in a US trade battle with Beijing.

credit: theguardian
tech nexus
Let us know what you think!

Post a Comment

search nerddict


Why I Decided to Change Domain Names To Techgasm247

Holla Nerddicts! I am sure you have been seeing the notification I put up stating " we will be officially and permanently parked to T...

Subscribe to Nerddict Newsletter

Get the Hottest Tech News, Tech Tutorials & How-Tos, Gadget Reviews & Browsing Cheats straight into your → INBOX

Trending Posts

Blog Archive

Nerddict Tech Hub. Powered by Blogger.